P
LANT
S
CIENCE
Bulletin
Fall 2015 Volume 61 Number 3
In This Issue..............
A Report from Congressional
Visits Day.... p. 96
BSA member and PlantingScience
teacher Kim Parfitt wins
Presidential Award.... p. 103
Student involvement key to success
of Botany 2015... p. 82
PLANTS Grant Recipients and Mentors Gather at Botany 2015!
From the Editor
Fall 2015 Volume 61 Number 3
PLANT SCIENCE
BULLETIN
Editorial Committee
Volume 61
Kathryn LeCroy
(2018)
Environmental Sciences
University of Virginia
kal8d@virginia.edu
L.K. Tuominen
(2016)
Department of Natural Science
Metropolitan State University
St. Paul, MN 55106
Lindsey.Tuominen@metrostate.edu
Daniel K. Gladish
(2017)
Department of Biology &
The Conservatory
Miami University
Hamilton, OH 45011
gladisdk@muohio.edu
Carolyn M. Wetzel
(2015)
Biology Department
Division of Health and
Natural Sciences
Holyoke Community College
303 Homestead Ave
Holyoke, MA 01040
cwetzel@hcc.edu
Melanie Link-Perez
(2019)
Department of Biology
Armstrong State University
11935 Abercorn Street
Savannah, GA 31419
melanie.link-perez@armstrong.edu
This issue of Plant Science Bulletin has been
a very inspiring one to prepare because it is
filled with reports, reflections, and photos
from Botany 2015. For those of us who
could come together at this year’s annual
society meeting, it was a great time for
reconnecting with colleagues and friends,
learning exciting new methods, discovering
new ideas and, of course, advancing the
field of botany.
In the following pages, you will read
about the meeting from the perspective
of scientists, teachers, and students
involved in many different aspects of
BSA programming. On page 89, Johanne
Stogran, BSA Director of Conferences,
reports on the preliminary feedback from
meeting attendees and provides some
staggering quantitative information about
Botany 2015. We also present the winners
of several societal and sectional awards, in
particular, the 2015 Distinguished Fellow
and Emerging Leader Awards (page 92).
The Plant Science Bulletin extends warmest
congratulations to all of this year’s award
winners.
In this issue, we are also pleased to report
on the continued success of BSA programs
oriented at education and professional
development, including PLANTS and
Planting Science. An article on page 96
details the experiences of the 2015 Public
Policy Award Winners at Congressional
Visit Day. These programs are vital pieces
of the society’s efforts to fulfill its mission.
I hope that you will find these initiatives
as exciting to hear about as I do. If you are
interested in becoming involved in any of
these programs, please contact the BSA
office.
81
Table of Contents
Society News
Survey Says: Botany 2015 in Edmonton was a Huge Success ........................................82
Making Success in Botany ...............................................................................................85
PLANTS Bringing Botany to New Heights .....................................................................89
BSA Award Winners .........................................................................................................92
BSA Public Policy Award Winners Attend Congressional Visits Day .............................96
BSA Science Education News and Notes.
....................................................
102
BSA Committees in Action..
Student Section
The BSA Executive Board Welcomes Becky Povilus ...................................................106
Students Succeed at Botany 2015 ...................................................................................108
Announcements
Bullard Fellowship .........................................................................................................109
Book Reviews
Economic Botany ...........................................................................................................110
Evolution ........................................................................................................................111
History ........................................................................................................................112
Systematics ....................................................................................................................113
Celebrating our past - Conserving our future!
International Trade and Convention Center
Savannah, Georgia
www.botanyconference.org
82
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
Survey Says… Botany 2015
in Edmonton Was a Huge
Success!
By Johanne Stogran, BSA Director of Conferences
Edmonton truly welcomed us for Botany 2015,
with its warm hospitality and excitement to have
us in the city! Did you see the welcome decals
at the airport? And the big window signs at the
Shaw Conference Centre provided a great first
impression as we arrived. In addition, we made
quite an economic impact on the city to the tune of
nearly $1 million!
This was the biggest Botany conference to
date hosted by the BSA. We were invited by the
Canadian Societies and had a team of 14 partner
societies in this adventure. There was a lot of
energy, diversity, and exciting and interesting talks
and presentations.
Comments in the survey included the following:
• “I like a conference where many societies and
disciplines are brought together.”
• “
Botany (conference) was fantastic—even
better than I was expecting. Great oppor-
tunities to meet new people and hear about
fascinating and cutting-edge research.”
• “Positive energy
—
what I most enjoyed was
the diversity of talks/topics and people. I
did learn a lot about other research fields
and I have met a lot of people from differ-
ent parts of the world! What also stuck with
my mind is the message that we have to tell
the world that Botany is cool!”
• “My students enjoy interacting with scientists
and learning about other topics.”
• “After attending the conference, my under-
graduate researcher is calling herself a
botanist!”
The Shaw Convention Centre was the
appropriate place to hold a conference of this size;
the exhibit hall was large enough for the record
number of exhibitors, and it was full of energy
during the breaks and receptions. We always make
a conscious effort to hold as many events in the hall
as possible to give the exhibitors the attention they
deserve, which is why all the coffee breaks were in
the hall. One of the perks that exhibitors are offered
is an e-mail list of all attendees so that they can
personally invite you to visit them in their booth
during the conference.
There were plenty of breakout rooms of varying
sizes, and sessions were assigned to rooms by the
projected attendance as noted by the program
directors of each session. Symposia organizers are
also asked to indicate how many they expect to
attend. Unfortunately, the estimates can be a bit
off and rooms can be either too big—or worse, too
small!
Many thanks to all of you who stayed within our
negotiated room blocks at the hotels. Through an
agreement with the city of Edmonton, the hotels
support the Convention Centre; since we fulfilled
our contracts with the hotels, the rental at the Shaw
was FREE! This saves the conference a considerable
amount of money and lets us keep registration rates
as low as we can—much lower than other kinds of
professional conferences. Going forward, we hope
to always be able to keep costs low to enable more
students and young professionals to attend.
This year we had a record number of posters
—
almost 500, or twice what we usually have! Rather
than limit poster submissions, we chose to accept
all and that meant we needed to split them into
two locations. Although the official poster session
is Monday evening, all the posters do stay up for
the entire conference, giving everyone plenty of
opportunities to view them. If you miss talking to
an author at the poster session time, you can always
connect with them via email
—
or meet over coffee!
83
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
Over 80% of you found the conference app to
be useful—and many of your comments will be
used to upgrade it further for next year. One of
the biggest issues is that it currently doesn’t sync
with the online abstract site, so this is one of the
enhancements we will be working on for future
versions. The app is the most effective way to stay up
to date with any of the on-site changes that occur.
The post-conference survey indicated that 43% of
attendees use an iPhone 3 years old or newer, but
we will also work to ensure older devices can use
the app efficiently. In addition, almost 90% of you
still like to use the program book! o, yes, we will
keep printing it while improving it to make it easier
to use.
The majority of you attend the conference
to present your research, and for networking
opportunities. We promise to keep these as strong
incentives to attend while adding new ideas and
programs to increase opportunities for both.
And finally, there was an interesting result from
the survey: a little more than 50% of you said you
heard of the conference by word of mouth! This is
fantastic! You are talking about the conference and
telling your colleagues and students about your
experiences and the many reasons to attend Botany
conferences. Keep it up and tell….keep it up and
tell them about Botany 2016 in Savannah, Georgia.
It is going to be the best one, yet!
84
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
85
program, a program she’s passionate about because
of its ability to reach young minds with science.
“At the Botany conference, we are building
relationships and science,” Miller says. “We are
trying ideas and abandoning some. We are finding
collaborators.
“It is an exciting time for us in the Society
and in science,” Miller says. “We are dealing
with challenges and opportunities in food and
environment—global challenges that can be
answered with our help. There is a need for people
who understand plants to answer those questions.
We’re on a great trajectory and I am interested to
see how, moving forward, we identify and seize the
opportunities we have.”
Making Success in Botany,
with a Little Help from
Your Friends
By Janice Dahl, Great Story!
The Botanical Society of America is like family
for many of the scientists that make it their
professional home.
They were introduced to the Society as students,
were entrenched in good science, met leading
scientists, and continue to embrace the community
as their own.
Dr. Allison Miller is a perfect case in point. The
newest member of the BSA Board as Director-At-
Large for Education, a mentor with the PLANTS
Program, and past Chair of the Economic Botany
Section, it’s clear that the Associate Professor of
Biology St. Louis University and Research Associate
for the Missouri Botanical Garden has a passion for
giving back to botany.
“I have been the beneficiary of the actions of
the Botanical Society since I was an undergrad,”
she says. “I have a sense of wanting to give back so
others can enjoy what I have.”
Miller is excited to join the Board of Directors
for the BSA to lead the Education area. “It is a great
opportunity to work with people with similar goals,”
she says. She’ll be working on the PlantingScience
Society News
86
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
Dr. Chris Martine is the David Burpee Professor
of Plant Genetics and Research Curator, Manning
Herbarium, Biology Department at Bucknell
University. He consistently focuses on bringing as
many students as possible to the Botany conference
every year.
“This is a kind and supportive environment for
students to present their research,” Martine says.
“Even if they are challenged, it will be supportive
and it will help them grow as scientists. There are a
lot of undergrads living in research,” says Martine.
“Part of being in science is being engaged in science,
and that means seeing and being engaged in this
conference. That would be botany.
“The connections I made here became my
community. The Society encourages and supports
members willing to support science. That’s the way
it works. That encourages me to do good things,
and I have that same hope for my students.”
Martine recently became a Lifetime Member of
BSA, the youngest member to do so. The decision,
he says, was both logical and emotional. “I’ve got a
lot of years left, so the numbers just made sense,”
he said with a smile. “I also believe so strongly in
what BSA does for the botany community, what it
does for me, and what it does for my students, that
it was a way for me, in some small way, to show a
level of support.”
“I’m the one that got a tattoo of my plant at the
Boise Botany conference,” says Dr. Ranessa Cooper
of Hillsdale College, Hillsdale, MI, with a huge
smile and a glint of mischief as she shows it off.
“I started coming to these conferences as an
undergrad in 1995 with Jeff Osborn and I’ve only
missed three in 20 years. This is my meeting,” she
stresses. “There is no better meeting to adopt. I
love to come because of the people; it’s like a family
reunion. And BSA is just a great group of people.
You are literally choosing your future professor and
preparing for your future jobs here.”
At the Edmonton Botany conference, Cooper
was truly multi-tasking by co-organizing a
colloquium, roasting a colleague at the Paleobotany
banquet, mentoring a student through the PLANTS
program, co-hosting the Michigan banquet, and
helping her own students with presentations. “It’s
a very full and fulfilling meeting,” Cooper says,
talking about the effect that BSA’s outreach and
networking has had on her own career and can have
for the students who come into the programs now.
She calls the “breadth of science” at the
conference “inspiring” and draws on much of the
research to show her students how exciting the
science is and the scope of ongoing research. “I’ve
been inspired here, and I hope I help someone else
with my data when I present,” she said.
“Botany meetings are the best thing since sliced
bread,” says Dr. Chelsea Specht of the University
of California, Berkeley, and Curator of Monocots
at the University and Jepson Herbaria. “You know
87
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
As a mentor, both in the PLANTS program
and in her university role, Specht says she loves
the opportunity to open doors for students. “As a
mentor, I have students work on a variety of things.
I make sure they have a variety of materials and
experiences. In the end, the right choice for them
might not be botany, but sometimes it is.”
Dr. Selena Smith at the University of Michigan—
and winner of the Emerging Leader Award—grew
up on acreage and fell in love with plants and
dinosaurs as a child. She knew early that science
was her destiny, but it wasn’t until late high school
that a lucky half-term in botany grabbed both her
imagination and her intellect.
Now, as an
Assistant Professor of Earth &
Environmental Sciences and Program in the
Environment in the Department of Earth &
Environmental Sciences at the University of
Michigan, she looks back with a smile at those early
studies that took her to the life she loves today.
“I want to continue the legacy,” Dr. Smith says. “I
have a high school student in my lab now...I’ve been
in the field for a long time, I’ve been in research for
a long time, I’ve mentored and been mentored, I’ve
been Associate Editor for the American Journal of
Botany, and I’ve organized symposia. I’m engaged.
That’s part of it. Research is fun and it’s one part
of it. But if we are the only ones with a clue, it’s
not enough. For paleobotany, we have to engage
people’s imagination and show them how things
everybody and it feels like you just saw them. The
Society catches people early in their careers and
keeps them all the way through. They engage you in
education and outreach,” Specht says.
The end result? “You can fit in, give and receive,
and you don’t have to wait for age or buy-in to
benefit from the Society.”
The relationships built through BSA and the
Botany conferences are “like being part of a club,”
Specht explains. “When you go for tenure, you
have to have letters from 15 people. Those people
cannot be mentors or collaborators. I easily had
those supporting letters because of this community
of people who had seen my research here at this
meeting. They knew me and they knew my work.
And they knew me well. That is super important in
our community.”
Specht remembers her first presentation at a
Botany conference in 1997 as a grad student and
having senior scientist James Seago listening,
commenting, and complimenting her work. “Today,
our society is so negative in most ways. To publish
or get a grant, so much of the feedback is negative,”
she says. “But this meeting is positive. They know
you and your work. You become part of something,
nationally and internationally too.”
Specht wanted the chance to give back, so she
signed on to the PLANTS Program as a mentor.
“I like the cascading structure where the students
are assigned both student and faculty mentors,” she
said.
88
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
have changed. Evolution, ecology and climate change
—
it’s all relevant, current, and important.”
Smith says, “If we don’t tell people how important plants are, they’ll never appreciate them. Even if just a
few of the students we mentor go on in botany, we have still helped more people appreciate plants.”
For young people thinking about a career, Smith has some advice. “Figure out what you enjoy doing and
be sure what you like.” She talks about the “circuitous” route she took to find exactly the right spot. “You
have to be patient and creative, and be open to ideas and networking,” she says.
“Paleobotany is like one big family, very supportive of one another—a community,” Smith says.
During her first trip to the Botany conference in 1999, she felt the sense of community and was amazed
at the good science
—
“science from good scientists,” she calls it. And the kicker was the integration of the
disciplines that she believes “you wouldn’t find anywhere else.”
Winning the Emerging Leader Award is a bit surreal for Smith, who still remembers coming to that first
Botany conference as a freshman undergrad with a poster presentation. Now, she is working with her own
graduate student, watching her blossom and become more engaged and loving botany. That, she says, is
the ultimate reward.
89
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
But that tiny piece of knowledge from Atkinson
changed everything. She needed more education.
She applied for an NSF Fellowship and was funded
for a trip to the lowland rainforest in Costa Rica,
and the light of her dream grew brighter.
“Kids in the country or even in the inner city
just don’t think this level of education is possible,”
Contreras said, explaining the importance of
diversity programs like BSA’s PLANTS program,
where she mentors and serves on her own
university’s Diversity Committee.
“We have to encourage science, reach out too, if
we want to impact passion for science to students.
We have to fish for interest and foster that interest
if it’s there.”
Brian Atkinson, Contrera’s mentor, is a fourth-
year Ph.D. student in Oregon State’s Botany and
Plant Pathology Department who started out at a
PLANTS grant recipient, coming to the conference
as a fine arts student and finding his way slowly to
paleobotany. Today, he credits that transformation
in large part to the contacts and relationships built
through the BSA and the Botany conference.
“When they called for mentors, for me it was
really about giving that same experience that I had
to people from underrepresented groups. Since
plants are so important to me, the PLANTS grant is
there for people like me to get access to the Botany
conference and understand how the meeting
works.”
PLANTS Program Brings
Botany to New Heights
By Janice Dahl, from Great Story!
The PLANTS program (Preparing Leaders
and Nurturing Tomorrow’s Scientists: Increasing
the diversity of plant scientists) has been
bringing talented and diverse undergraduate
students to the Botany conference for the past
five years. This program, funded by the National
Science Foundation and the Botanical Society of
America, brought 13 students to Botany 2015,
where they received mentoring from graduate
students, postdocs, and faculty, and participated
in networking events, including the Diversity
Luncheon and career-oriented activities. The
program covers the normal costs of travel,
registration, food, and accommodation at the
meeting.
In August, the BSA received confirmation that
it is receiving another NSF grant to continue the
PLANTS program, with some enhancements, for
the next five years. This is fantastic news, especially
since botanists are saying that the PLANTS
program, quite literally, changed the course of their
lives.
“The PLANTS grant was the only way I could
have come to the Botany conference,” says
Dori Contreras, a fourth-year Ph.D. student
in paleobotany at the University of California,
Berkeley. That was the first year of the PLANTS
program—in 2010—and Contreras said she had no
idea she wanted to be a botanist.
Paired with mentor Brian Atkinson, she
learned about the possibilities of networking.
“The connections I have made here have made a
big difference,” she says. “I am the poster child for
networking at these conferences,” where you meet
people she calls “science famous.”
Contreras grew up in a family with five children,
with her mom graduating from college after 10
years of taking one class after another. Contreras
supported herself from the age of 17 and worked
40 to 60 hours a week through most of her college
career, with a strong aversion to loans.
“I worked retail, sold trucks, and worked in auto
finance. I was doing well for myself in business,
but it wasn’t satisfying. It was boring,” she says. “I
wanted something more. I didn’t know graduate
school was an option for me,” Contreras says flatly.
90
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
Atkinson has mentored three people, all of whom
were very different in terms of personality, course
of study, and expectations from the conference.
In large part, the mentorship is about “developing
relationships and offering conference guidance that
is beneficial” to the individual student, he says.
James McDaniel of the University of Wisconsin-
Madison, started coming to the Botany conference
in 2011 as an undergrad. “I knew a little about
plants, but I wanted to know more,” he said. He
was paired with a peer mentor and a professor
mentor, both of whom taught him the ropes about
the conference and the expectations for him as a
recipient of a PLANTS grant. “The most exciting
thing was the networking,” he says now, “meeting
all these people you would potentially be working
with in the future. These people,” he says with a
look across the sweeping floor of the conference
center, “are the key to your success.”
Now, as a fourth-year Ph.D. student at the
University of Wisconsin-Madison, McDaniel
believes strongly in the power of the relationships
he has built through the PLANTS program, BSA,
and the Botany conference. It’s a long way from
the future he once imagined as a high-school or
middle-school teacher, and he says his passion for
plants came from all the scientists he met along the
way.
“I love research and I love passing on that
knowledge,” McDaniel says. So when he looks at
the PLANTS Program now, he sees a way to pass
along some of the benefits he received. “I like
passing on some of the information about getting
into grad school, getting funding for school and
research, and fellowships—things I didn’t know
existed,” McDaniel says. “The mentees are getting
the kind of friends they need and deserve through
this program.
“It’s a great experience to be able to pass that
knowledge on to another person, the knowledge
that my mentor passed on to me.”
McDaniel says, “Diversity is a huge issue for
science. This conference is getting more minorities
and diverse groups into the sciences all the time,
but it’s our job as scientists to get out there and
interest people in science.”
Dr. David L. Gorchov of the Department of
Biology at Miami University, Oxford, in Ohio is
a long-time mentor with the PLANTS program.
He says, “It’s part of being a professor to train the
next generation. The Botany conferences can be
intimidating, but the programs are well organized
and it’s our jobs as mentors to be helpful so the
students don’t have to figure it out by themselves.”
“It’s easy to be a mentor,” says the 25-year BSA
member. “It has a positive effect on me and on the
next generation.”
Dr. Gorchov talks about one “very artsy, creative
student” he mentored in the beginning years of the
PLANTS program, and his smile broadens. “The
student would consistently miss our meetings,
despite my reminders. I thought the whole thing
was very unsatisfactory in my eyes. But a few years
later I learned that the student’s overall performance
had improved because of the feedback I gave.”
Conversely, Dr. Gorchov said, “My student this
year is well prepared, asking all the right questions,
and might actually not grow as much from the
mentoring. You just don’t know.”
“When they called for mentors,
for me it was really about giving
that same experience that I had
to people from underrepresented
groups. Since plants are so
important to me, the PLANTS
grant is there for people like
me to get access to the Botany
conference and understand how
the meeting works.
91
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
Dr. Chelsea Specht of the University of
California, Berkeley, and Curator of Monocots
for the University and Jepson Herbaria, said she
wanted the chance to give back, so she signed on
to the PLANTS program as a mentor. “I like the
cascading structure where the students are assigned
both student and faculty mentors,” she said.
As a mentor, both in the PLANTS program
and in her university role, Specht said she loves
the opportunity to open doors for students. “As a
mentor, I have students work on a variety of things.
I make sure they have a variety of materials and
experiences. In the end, the right choice for them
might not be botany, but sometimes it is.”
That’s really what happened with her, Specht
says, recalling her pre-med background and the
explorations that led her into evolutionary biology,
ethno-pharmacology, and eventually to plant
molecular genetics and systematics. She simply
loved the exploration and the science, and in turn,
loves showing others that same exploratory process
that turned her on to botany.
“BSA is uniquely good at bringing in people at an
early age and keeping them engaged,” Specht said.
“Young people have energy and ideas, and being
involved is helpful to your career, too. It’s good for
the members and the Society.”
“BSA is uniquely good at bringing
in people at an early age and
keeping them engaged. Young
people have energy and ideas,
and being involved is helpful to
your career, too. It’s good for the
members and the Society.”
92
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
her own students and those who are not. The 13
PhD students she has graduated to date have all
remained involved in science or education, several
of them becoming accomplished scientists in their
own right. Collinson served as the President of the
International Organization of Paleobotany as well
as taking on leadership roles in other organizations.
To quote one letter, “Her creativity, incredible
productivity and warm collegiality together
conspire to make her an excellent example of those
who would be recipients of this award.”
Donald Levin
Professor Don Levin has been enormously
productive and influential in diverse areas of
research at the interface of population genetics,
hybridization, breeding system biology, defense
mechanisms, and polyploidy. He has an exceptional
record of achievement in research that is
recognized both nationally and internationally; this
impressive record has stretched for half a century
and continues today. Levin is a world leader in
research and one of the leading botanical figures of
our time. Some of the most influencial papers and
books in plant evolutionary biology over the past
several decades were written by Levin. There are
few researchers possessing such diverse expertise
who do so many things so well and have made
such major contributions in so many areas of plant
biology.
BSA AWARD WINNERS
The Botanical Society of
America’s 2015 Distinguished
Fellow Award Winners
The Botanical Society of America Distinguished
Fellow Award (formerly known as the Merit
Award) is the highest honor our Society bestows.
Each year, the Merit Award Committee solicits
nominations, evaluates candidates, and selects
those to receive an award. Awardees are chosen
based on their outstanding contributions to the
mission of our scientific Society. The committee
identifies recipients who have demonstrated
excellence in basic research, education, and public
policy, or who have provided exceptional service to
the professional botanical community, or who may
have made contributions to a combination of these
categories. Based on these stringent criteria, the
2015 BSA Distinguished Fellow Award recipients
are Margaret E. Collinson, Donald Levin, and
Jonathan F. Wendel.
Professor Margaret E. Collinson
Professor Margaret Collinson is an
internationally known and respected plant
paleobiologist. She has been elected as a Foreign
Member of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts
and Sciences, and serves as a corresponding Member
of the Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung
(Germany) and Honorary Research Fellow of the
Natural History Museum (London). Her work is
broad and multidisciplinary, covering paleobotany,
plant systematics, paleoecology, plant-animal
interactions in the past, and plant biochemistry.
Particularly noteworthy contributions include early
Cenozoic vegetation history, the fossil record of
ferns, and highlighting the importance of fire in
paleoecoystems. Because of these diverse interests,
in many ways Collinson is an ambassador of botany
by continuously showing its relevance to other
disciplines such as Earth sciences and paleontology,
while also making novel contributions to traditional
botanical sciences. In addition to her scholarly
work, Collinson is a tireless and dedicated teacher,
and a mentor and supporter of paleobotany. She
has been recognized with undergraduate teaching
awards, mentored numerous young scientists,
and does not distinguish between those who are
93
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
Dr. Selena Y. Smith Receives
Emerging Leader Award
Selena Smith has only recently become an
Assistant Professor of Earth & Environmental
Sciences and Program in the Environment (and
Museum of Paleontology) at the University of
Michigan. Nevertheless, she already has established
an exemplary record of innovative scientific
research, professional leadership, and student
mentorship. Selena initiated her program of
paleobotanical research as a high school honor
student, conducting, completing, and publishing
her first scientific paper before entering the
University of Alberta, where she completed an
additional nine papers while completing her B.S.
and Ph.D. degrees in 2002 and 2007, respectively.
In 2005 she received the first NSERC André Hamer
Doctoral Postgraduate prize, awarded to the single
most outstanding doctoral student in Canada.
Smith already has published more than 30 refereed
papers (since the year 2000). The superior quality
of her studies has been appreciated since her first
presentations, earning her numerous awards,
including the Isabel Cookson Award (for best
research student presentation in paleobotany at
the annual Botany conferences), and prestigious
competitive pre-doctoral and post-doctoral
fellowships in Canada and the United Kingdom.
She has achieved continuous National Science
Foundation funding through multiple awards from
2010 through at least 2018. Smith’s studies go well
beyond the narrow systematic breadth, stratigraphic
ranges, or preservational modes that characterize
the work of less creative scientists, and she has
been at the forefront of developing and employing
new methods and technologies such as X-ray
Jonathan F. Wendel
Jonathan F. Wendel is one of the world’s leading
researchers studying the genetics and genomics of
plant polyploidy, particularly in cotton and other
species of the genus Gossypium, which has been the
focus of much of his work. His nearly 250 papers
span a staggeringly broad range of topics, not only
on polyploidy but on phylogenetics, systematic
theory, maize genetics, crop evolution, and
taxonomy, to name only a few. His work has always
been at the leading edge of his fields of interest,
beginning with isozymes and moving seamlessly
into the DNA era from its beginnings with
restriction enzymes, through manual sequencing,
and on into the current “next-generation” high-
throughput phase of comparative genomics.
Wendel has been noted throughout his career for
sharing his technical and theoretical insights in
incisive and lucid review papers. He is an excellent
colleague and valued collaborator, generously
giving of his time and boundless energy to further
the work and careers of others, and serving as an
organizer of important conferences and symposia.
Wendel is also an engaged mentor of graduate and
undergraduate students and visiting scientists. He is
a distinguished lecturer and educator, and someone
who has contributed tremendous service to his
institution, having served as chair of Iowa State
University’s Department of Ecology, Evolution,
and Organismal Biology since 2003. To quote from
three of his supporting letters, Wendel is “one of
the very elite plant evolutionary biologists in the
world”, whose work “has spanned decades and has
resulted in a new synthesis of views on the genetic
and genomic consequences of polyploidy”; “He is a
leading light in plant genome evolution.”
94
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
obovatum group.” Co-authors: Maria Vicent and
José María Gabriel y Galán
Isabel Cookson Award
(Paleobotanical Section)
Established in 1976, the Isabel Cookson Award
recognizes the best student paper presented in the
Paleobotanical Section.
Carla Harper, University of Kansas, “Biomarkers
in paleomycology – A case study using fungus-
infected Permian woods from Antarctica.” Co-
authors: Alison Olcott Marshall, Craig P. Marshall,
Thomas N. Taylor, Michael Krings and Edith L.
Taylor.
Katherine Esau Award
(Developmental and
Structural Section)
This award was established in 1985 with a
gift from Dr. Esau and is augmented by ongoing
contributions from Section members. It is given to
the graduate student who presents the outstanding
paper in developmental and structural botany at the
annual meeting.
Kelsey Galimba, University of Washington,
“Duplication and divergence of the floral organ
identity genes.” Co-authors: Jesús Martínez-Gomez
and Veronica Di Stilio.
Maynard Moseley Award
(Developmental & Structural
and Paleobotanical Sections)
The Maynard F. Moseley Award was established
in 1995 to honor a career of dedicated teaching,
scholarship, and service to the furtherance of the
botanical sciences. The award is given to the best
student paper, presented in either the Paleobotanical
or Developmental and Structural sessions, that
advances our understanding of plant structure in an
evolutionary context.
Stephanie Conway, University of Melbourne,
Australia, “Surface analysis of cell division in the
shoot apical meristem of gymnosperms.” Co-author:
Andrew Drinnan.
tomography, which uses synchrotron technology
to develop non-invasive 3-D images of fossil plants
that may still be imbedded in rock matrix. Her
work also spans a wide range of foci, including
structure and development, reproductive biology,
paleoecology and paleophytogeography, and
systematics and evolution of ferns, gymnosperms,
flowering plants, and fungi.
Margaret Menzel Award
(Genetics Section)
The Margaret Menzel Award is presented by the
Genetics Section for the outstanding paper presented
in the contributed papers sessions of the annual
meetings.
Dr. Joshua Puzzy, College of William and
Mary, “Nuclear phylogenomics of the seed plants”
Co-authors: Shing Hei Zhan, Tao Chen, Michael
Deyholos, James Leebens-Mack, Dennis Stevenson,
Philip Thomas, Gane Ka-Shu Wong, Sean W.
Graham and Sarah Mathews.
A. J. Sharp Award
(Bryological and
Lichenological Section)
The A.J. Sharp Award is presented each year by
the American Bryological and Lichenological Society
and the Bryological and Lichenological Section for
the best student presentation. The award, named
in honor of the late Jack Sharp, encourages student
research on bryophytes and lichens.
Manuela Dal Forno, George Mason University,
“Mycobiont cladogenesis triggered by photobiont
speciation: A case study of the Rhizonema-Cora
lichen symbiosis.” Co-authors: James D. Lawrey and
LRobert Lucking
Edgar T. Wherry Award
(Pteridological Section and
the American Fern Society)
The Edgar T. Wherry Award is given for the
best paper presented during the contributed papers
session of the Pteridological Section. This award is
in honor of Dr. Wherry’s many contributions to the
floristics and patterns of evolution in ferns.
Dr. Emily Butler Sessa, University of Florida,
“Exploring potential asymmetric hybridization
in a Mediterranean fern complex: the Asplenium
95
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
Physiological Section
Li-Cor Prize - Paper
Kerri Mocko, University of Connecticut, for
the paper “Stomatal behavior and integration of
functional traits are consistent with climate of origin
for co-occurring congeners” Co-author: Cynthia
Jones
Physiological Section
Li-Cor Prize - Poster
John A. Huber, Brigham Young University, for
the poster “Exploring the possibility of photosynthetic
plasticity in Agave sensu lato” Co-author: J. Ryan
Stewart
Developmental & Structural
Section Student Travel Awards
Riva Bruen, University of California at Berkeley
(Advisor, Chelsea Specht)
Kelsey Galimba, University of Washington
(Advisor, Veronica Di Stilio)
Ecology Section S
tudent Travel Awards
Laura Bogar, Stanford University (Advisor, Dr.
Kabir G. Peay)
Eric Limbird, Middle Tennessee State University
(Advisor, Dr. Jeffrey Walck)
Genetics Section
Student Travel Awards
Hanna Dorman, Mississippi State University
(Advisor, Dr. Lisa Wallace)
Jacob Landis, University of Florida (Advisor, Dr.
Pamela Soltis)
Brandon Sinn, Ohio State University (Advisor,
Dr. John V. Freudenstein)
Pteridological Section
& American Fern Society
Student Travel Awards
Kelsey Cook
Benjamin Dauphin
Joel Nitta
Genetics Section Student
Research Awards
Genetics Section Student Research Awards provide
$500 for research funding and an additional $500 for
attendance at a future BSA meeting.
Carlos I. Arbizu-Berrocal, University of
Wisconsin-Madison, Graduate Student Award
(Advisors: Drs. David Spooner and Philipp Simon),
for the proposal “Molecular and morphological
studies of wild and cultivated carrot from Turkey, the
genus Daucus.”
Beck Powers, University of Vermont, Masters
Student Award (Advisor: Dr. Jill Preston), for the
proposal “Genetic building blocks in the evolution of
sympetaly: a candidate gene approach.”
Ecology Section
Student Presentation Awards
Emily Rollinson (Graduate Student), Stony
Brook University, for the paper “Functional diversity
and the assembly of riparian plant communities” Co-
author: Jessica Gurevitch
Tammy Elliot (Graduate Student), McGill
University, for the paper “Understanding shifting
plant boundary distributions using phylogenetic
methods” Co-author: T. Jonathan Davies
Hanna Dorman, Mississippi State University,
for the best Graduate Student poster “Genetic
structure of Rhizobia associated with Chamaecrista
fasciculata” Co-author: Lisa Wallace
Mae Lacey, for the best Undergraduate Student
poster “Exploring the potential for Solanum fruit
ingestion and seed dispersal by rock-dwelling
mammals in the Australian monsoon tropics” Co-
authors: Elizabeth Capaldi, Ingrid Jordon-Thaden
and Chris Martine
Physiological Section
Student Presentation Awards
Vi Bui, University of Western Ontario, for the
paper “Wood anatomy of Norway spruce and
Scots pine under warming and elevated CO
2
” Co-
authors: Zsofia Stangl, Vaughan Hurry, Norman
Huner and Danielle Way
Erika Bucior, Ithaca College, for the poster
“The physiological responses of Brassica rapa (Fast
Plants) to nutrient and drought stress” Co-author:
Peter Melcher
96
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
BSA Public Policy
Award Winners Attend
Congressional Visits Day
By Morgan Gostel, Marian Chau, Andrew Pais, and
Ingrid Jordon-Thaden
This year, several BSA members traveled to
Washington, DC to speak with elected members of
Congress about the importance of federal funding
for basic research. The BSA has been participating
in the Congressional Visits Day (CVD) since 2012.
This event is sponsored by the Biological and
Ecological Sciences Coalition (BESC) and held
annually in Washington, DC.
Since becoming involved with this event, the
BSA’s Public Policy Committee has grown, become
more active, and expanded its national policy
involvement and visibility. Beginning in 2013, the
Board of the BSA voted unanimously to sponsor
an annual Public Policy Award for students and
early career scientists to support travel to and
participation in the CVD. This year the Public
Policy Award was awarded to one student and
one postdoc: Andrew Pais (North Carolina
State University) and Dr. Ingrid Jordon-Thaden
(Bucknell University), respectively. These awardees
have shared their experience, as follows.
We need to engage policymakers more frequently
in conversations about the value of federal funding
for science, share our work, and communicate its
significance regularly. One way to stay informed
about science policy is to sign up for bimonthly
policy alerts at http://policy.aibs.org/aibs, prepared
by the American Institute of Biological Science’s
(AIBS) Public Policy team.
Andrew’s Experience
When I applied for the BSA Public Policy Award,
my hope was to better understand how scientists
were participating in the realm of public policy. I
was pleased to meet with other scientists who had
embedded themselves in various agencies or had
joined the ranks amongst political appointees. As
part of the first morning’s events, I attended a panel
hosted by the Ecological Society of America (ESA)
and heard from several government employees who
started their careers in science and transitioned
into public policy. The panel discussion included:
Laura Petes, Assistant Director for Climate
Adaptation and Ecosystems at the White House
Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP);
Richard Pouyat, National Program Leader for Air
and Soil Quality Research at the U.S. Forest Service;
Alexis Erwin, Environmental Sustainability
Advisor Bureau for Africa at the United States
Agency for International Development (USAID);
and Alan Thornhill, Director for Office of Science
Quality and Integrity at the U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS). Among many other topics, we discussed
the importance of embedding ecologists and
other non-medical life scientists in all aspects
of government—emphasizing the need to put
scientists at the table where they haven’t normally
been expected to participate. I took this point to
heart as we trained how to effectively advocate
federal scientific policies to our representatives and
senators in Congress.
The remainder of the day was spent reviewing
aspects of the proposed budget for the National
Science Foundation (NSF) in fiscal year 2016. Kei
Koizumi, Assistant Director for Federal Research
and Development in the White House OSTP,
summarized the $7.7 billion NSF budget proposed
to Congress, and CVD participants were also
informed about H.R. 1806, a re-authorization bill
going through the House of Representatives that
would put constraints on how the NSF allocated its
funds to certain scientific disciplines not deemed
to be “in the national interest.” With the objectives
given to CVD participants (to encourage support
BSA Public Policy Awardee Andrew Pais.
97
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
for the proposed $7.7 billion for the NSF and not
support H.R. 1806), participants divided into teams
by state of residence and prepared talking points
to deliver to their congresspersons. Besides me,
the team representing North Carolina included
Kevin Kloeppel, Associate Graduate School Dean
and Associate Professor in Western Carolina
University; Christine Muth, Biology Instructor at
the North Carolina School of Science and Math;
and Robert Gropp, AIBS Director of Public Policy
and Co-Executive Director. Together we made up
an effective team that could communicate how the
NSF was vital from an administrator’s, teacher’s,
and student’s perspective.
The next day, we first delivered our message to
the offices of two Republican senators from North
Carolina; we met with legislative assistants in both
Senator Burr and Senator Tillis’ offices. The staffers
were very friendly and receptive to our points.
My argument for sustaining a trained workforce
in science and technology resonated well with the
Senate offices since training and retaining skilled
scientists in the Research Triangle Park (RTP)
would continue to attract businesses and bring
jobs to North Carolina. In particular, I thought
my meeting with Senator Tillis’ office was very
productive. I look forward to meeting with Senator
Tillis’ legislative assistant again since he is an alum
from my home university and will return to North
Carolina for the August recess. We may even
have the opportunity to schedule Senator Tillis to
meet with us and participate in a photo-op at my
university.
After our visits with Senate offices, we sat in on
an appropriation subcommittee meeting, and then
we met with House offices representing North
Carolina. Although Republican and Democrat
representatives sitting on the subcommittee did not
come to a final agreement at the time that we sat
in on their meeting over commerce appropriations,
the atmosphere in the room seemed very cordial
and not at all polarizing as I would have expected.
Indeed, every representative office we met greeted
us with a respectful and welcoming tone. Of the
House of Representative offices we met from North
Carolina [Rep. Butterfield (D), Rep. Meadows (R),
and Rep. Price (D)], all three responded positively
to our message. Although Rep. Meadows did vote
in support of H.R. 1806, I still appreciated the
courtesy of his office to consider the concerns
we had over the reauthorization bill. Not every
politician is going to agree with the policies that
the scientific community largely endorses, but we
are better off engaging with everyone so that our
message is at least at the table when decisions have
to be made.
In summary, while many of the policy decisions
made in Congress may appear to be predictable
along party lines at first glance, I honestly believe
there is room for persuasion when making the
case for federal funding of pure scientific research.
I have personally communicated with my Senator
and Representatives on how federal funds have
advanced my research and how such research has
benefitted North Carolina. I would encourage
botanists and all life scientists to contact their
elected officials. Many Congressional staffers are
well educated and eager to learn more about how
your work can benefit their state. However, many
of our policy makers are not experts in science,
and they are relying on your expertise to guide
their decisions. Of everything I observed from this
trip, I would just like to reiterate how easy it is to
schedule a meeting with your Congressperson.
Don’t just vote—get your foot in the door at a
House or Senate office next time you’re near D.C
or your local state capitol. Most political offices
regularly host constituent visits, and scientific
societies such as the AIBS are glad to coordinate
a visit for you. Although travelling to Washington
D.C. can be expensive, many scientific societies
are now recognizing the importance of connecting
scientists with government offices and providing
travel awards. I am grateful that the BSA supported
my visit to D.C., and I hope others may use this
award for future visits with Congress.
Ingrid’s Experience
As an Environmental and Public Policy
Committee (EPPC) member for American Society
of Plant Taxonomists (ASPT), I was asked to
Not every politician is going
to agree with the policies that
the scientific community largely
endorses, but we are better off
engaging with everyone so that
our message is at least at the table
when decisions have to be made.
98
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
participate in the annual Biological and Ecological
Sciences Coalition (BESC) Congressional Visits
Day (CVD) in May 2015. (Watch out, I think I
am on the road to becoming a political lobbyist
considering the number of acronyms in this
synopsis!) While still holding onto my lab coat
and plant labels, part of my own personal growth
is to explore the facets of how I as a scientist can
contribute to the decisions being made in the big
white, marble buildings of State and Federal offices.
Each year, CVD organizers prepare messages and
materials the week before the event. Things change
so fast in Washington, D.C., that an agenda for
discussion may need to be altered the night before.
In total, 29 participants held 54 appointments with
Congressional offices from 15 states to advocate for
increased federal investments in scientific research.
This year we asked members of Congress to support
the President’s Fiscal Year 2016 Budget Proposal,
including $7.7 billion for the National Science
Foundation (NSF)—a $500 million increase from
the 2015 budget and a 3% increase in the Biology
Directive.
My team consisted of five CVD participants from
Maryland (Charles Fenster from the University of
Maryland, College Park), Pennsylvania (myself,
Bucknell University), and Virginia (Megan
Paustian and Tammy Wilbert from the Smithsonian
Institution and Morgan Gostel from George Mason
University). Our morning meetings were kept
to the Senate side, bouncing from meetings with
Senator Cardin (MD), who met with us briefly
while waiting to speak with his legislative assistant,
Senator Mikulski (MD), Senator Toomey (PA),
and Senators Kaine and Warner (VA). During
our afternoon meetings, we met with offices
from the House of Representatives, including
Congressman Steny Hoyer (MD-5), Congressman
Tom Marino (PA-10), and Congressmen Connelly
(VA-11) and Beyer (VA-8). During part of the
afternoon, our team was divided due to scheduling
conflicts. Megan, Morgan, and Tammy met with
Representatives from Virginia, while Charlie and I
met with Representatives Hoyer and Marino.
Although our meeting with Senator Toomey’s
office was cut short, due to what seemed to be
another urgent appointment, our meeting with
Representative Marino, who spoke to us directly
between votes, was very engaging. His aide kept
him on a minute-by-minute schedule, while I
introduced our team, explained briefly why we were
there, and thanked him for seeing us personally.
Representative Marino got straight to the point,
asking each of us, one at a time, to explain why our
research is important to voters and why he should
be interested in it. I responded with an explanation
about a planned field trip to the Appalachian
BSA Public Policy Team posing with Senator Cardin (MD). L-R: Dr. Ingrid Jordon-Thaden, Morgan Gostel,
Dr. Charles Fenster, Senator Cardin, Dr. Megan Paustian, and Dr. Tammy Wilbert.
99
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
mountains of West Virginia to hunt for rare and
endemic perennial mustard, Draba ramosissima.
I explained that, similar to the presence of
dragonflies to indicate water quality, certain plant
species are sensitive to a declining habitat. If
indicator species, such as dragonflies and sensitive
mustards, are missing from a habitat, we know
that the overall biodiversity of that habitat is low.
Low biodiversity leads to a domino effect to other
problems in maintaining an ecosystem, including
erosion control and water quality. He literally
exclaimed “SOLD!” and that he would like to fund
this research! I asked him if I could hold him to that
and we shared a brief laugh. Representative Marino
was excited to hear what we had to say and agreed
with most of our points. It was invigorating to have
direct communication with Representative Marino,
whose vote has direct implications for funding
basic research.
Our take-home message resonated well during
the CVD meetings. Simply put, the NSF Biology
Directorate funds nearly 66% of all basic biology
research in the United States, and its importance
cannot be understated. The second most critical
part of our meetings was to stress the importance
of voting “No” to House Resolution 1806 (the
America COMPETES Reauthorization Act).
This legislation, while reauthorizing the NSF,
also implements burdensome oversight on the
management of NSF funds. An AIBS response
letter can be found at http://www.aibs.org/position-
statements/20150421_competes_reauth.html.
Unfortunately, the House passed HR 1806 the
week after our visit on May 20, 2015. Among the
Representatives whose offices we met with, only one
voted “Aye”—Representative Marino—despite his
supportive proclamations during our meeting. We
will monitor activity related to similar legislation
in the Senate, and we anticipate that the AIBS will
update us with Action Alerts to contact Senators
regarding America COMPETES in the future.
Congressional politics remain fraught with
partisanship and although basic research, by its very
essence, is nonpartisan, challenges lie ahead for
scientific funding if scientist voices are not heard.
If we, as botanists, do not remain informed and
aware of the policy that affects our work, we can be
assured of only one thing: that we are not a part of
legislative conversation. The ASPT EPPC and BSA
PPC look forward to continued interaction to best
communicate and pursue science policy priorities
for our membership. We will be presenting the
results of our 2014/2015 public policy surveys, with
big announcements regarding their implications
for shaping the future of public policy in ASPT and
BSA soon!
BSA Public Policy Team in front of the U.S. Capitol. L-R: Dr. Megan Paustian, Dr. Charles Fenster, Dr.
Tammy Wilbert, and Dr. Ingrid Jordon-Thaden.
100
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
American Journal of Botany
Showcases New Features…
.....and a New Look!
101
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
During the celebrations last year for the American Journal of Botany’s 100th year in publication—
which not only featured AJB Centennial Reviews in the journal itself, but interviews in the Plant Science
Bulletin of the AJB’s most prominent contributors—a question was being raised beyond acknowledging
the centennial.
Where does the journal go from here?
So far in 2015, the answers are evident. With the introduction of Editor-in-Chief Pam Diggle, the AJB
has added a few new elements to signify that the journal is pushing forward: a new essay feature, a new
Highlights section, and a revamped look to the journal itself.
The new essay feature—“On the Nature of Things,” named after the first-century BCE poem “De Rerum
Natura” by Titus Lucretius Carus—is the chief component of the AJB’s revitalized News and Views section.
These essays provide succinct and timely insights into multiple aspects of plant science; thus far, topics have
included species distributions, parasitism disruption, ecological restoration, plant invasions, conservation
genetics, and more. Stay tuned for these articles each month, and feel free to make suggestions to Dr.
Diggle at pamela.diggle@uconn.edu.
At the same time the essay feature was introduced, the AJB began featuring certain articles with its new
Highlights feature. This gives readers a way to quickly scan articles of special note in the issue as well as
articles that show the breadth of coverage in the journal.
And finally, the journal has a revamped look to match not only the new features, but also the ongoing
progressive content of the research articles. The updated fonts and layout give the AJB a modern look while
retaining the strong elements that have served the AJB well over its existence.
Make sure to check out
the entire breadth of the journal
at www.amjbot.org!
102
BSA Science Education
News and Notes
By Catrina Adams,
Education Director
BSA Science Education News and Notes is a
quarterly update about the BSA’s education efforts
and the broader education scene. We invite you
to submit news items or ideas for future features.
Contact Catrina Adams, Education Director, at
CAdams@botany.org.
PlantingScience Kicks Off
Second Decade with Largest
Fall Session Ever
I’m happy to report that PlantingScience, the
Botanical Society of America’s online mentoring
community, is growing by leaps and bounds, thanks
to support from BSA members and volunteer
scientist mentors, and through joint efforts with
our partnering plant societies. We are anticipating
our largest session ever for this fall, and expect over
2000 students will participate from over 40 schools
in the USA and Canada.
The ideas that were so radical in 2005 when Bruce
Alberts issued his challenge for scientific societies
like ours to help bring real science and scientists
into K-12 classrooms are now starting to get real
traction. Teachers around the world are looking
for ways for their students to explore their own
questions, gain critical thinking and quantitative
literacy skills, and break down negative stereotypes
of scientists to learn what scientists and science are
really like. New assessment tools are being built
to evaluate students’ ability to combine science
practice and content together as scientists do, and
standards are shifting to emphasize big ideas and
skills (doing science) over terminology and facts
(learning about science).
We’re entering a new decade with
PlantingScience, and it dovetails with this new era
in science education. We have a decade head-start
in honing our program to best help teachers bring
real plant science to their students, and our ability
to take advantage of the current opportunities
stems from our outstanding community of teachers
and scientist volunteers who have grown the
PlantingScience program into what it is today.
Welcome to Thsi Year’s
Master Plant Science Team Members!
MPST members are sponsored by the
PlantingScience partner societies. They commit
to extra mentoring and professional development
and work more closely with teachers. We are glad
to announce that the following BSA-sponsored
graduate students and postdocs will be a part of this
year’s cohort:
Kara Barron, Katie Becklin, Lee Beers, John
Bennett, Riva Bruenn, Steven Callen, Keri Caudle,
Julia Chapman, Kyle Christie, Taylor Crow, Will
Drews, Chloe Pak Drummond, Kate Eisen, Susan
Fawcett, Michelle Garcia, Katherine Goodall,
Laura Hancock, Claire T. Hann, Julie Herman,
Irene Liao, Gwynne Lim, Pamela Millan, Juliet
Oshiro, Rhiannon Peery, Megan Philpott, Susan
Pruitt, Junoo K. Tuladhar, Kirsten Verster, Evelyn
Williams, and Brett Steven Younginger.
New PlantingScience
“Agronomy Feeds the World”
Theme Under Development
Starting this fall, PlantingScience will be
partnering with the American Society of Agronomy
to develop a new, joint investigation module with the
theme “Agronomy Feeds the World.” We anticipate
that the new theme will be ready for testing next
fall and ready for teachers to choose the following
spring. The new module will help capture a rising
demand for real science experiences within high
school agriculture classes, and provide a link with
food and sustainability and exposure to a broader
range of plant science careers for middle and high
school science and biology classrooms. If you
already volunteer with PlantingScience, this will
be an opportunity to help students with something
new, and if you are not currently volunteering a
mentor, perhaps this new theme will excite you to
give it a try.
103
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
PlantingScience Teacher Kim
Parfitt receives Presidential
Award for Excellence in
Mathematics and Science
Teaching
Congratulations to BSA member and Cheyenne
Central High School teacher Kim Parfitt, who
recently received the prestigious Presidential
Award for Excellence in Mathematics and Science
Teaching (PAEMST). The annual award is made to
outstanding K-12 science teachers from across the
country. Kim is a longtime PlantingScience teacher
leader, and her video submission for the PAEMST
award featured her students participating in
PlantingScience’s C-Fern investigation, explaining
to her all about gametophytes and archegonia. Well
deserved, Kim!
We’re looking for new
PlantingScience mentors for
the upcoming spring session
As we expand and grow, we are looking for more
scientists willing to volunteer as mentors. The time
commitment is small, and you can mentor online
without leaving your office. Consider joining us
for the upcoming spring session (mid-February
through mid-April). You can apply at www.
PlantingScience.org/NewMentor
Upcoming Events
The QUBES (Quantitative Undergraduate
Biology Education and Synthesis) group is up and
running with a fantastic website featuring many
resources you may find helpful for your biology
classes, including the ability to run mathematical
and statistical software on the QUBES site without
local installation. You can find these resources at
qubeshub.org.
QUBES is also hosting a number of faculty
mentoring networks, including one that will launch
at November’s National Association of Biology
Teachers meeting in Providence, RI. If you are
planning to attend, please consider applying for the
network and representing plant biology.
104
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
PULSE has been working on a certification of
undergraduate biology education for the twenty-
first century. The group has recently announced
a series of “progression levels” for certification.
The PULSE certification is intended to motivate
important changes in life sciences education across
the country. The “progression levels” are intended
to be similar to the U.S. Green Building Council’s
LEED certification, where organizations can be
recognized for certain thresholds of achievement.
Eight schools participated in a pilot assessment,
and all have made strides towards Vision and
Change recommendations in comparison with a
traditional biology curriculum, achieving ranks of
“PULSE Progression Level I: Beginning” through
“PULSE Progression Level III: Accomplished.”
You can learn more about the PULSE certification
efforts here:
http://www.pulsecommunity.org/page/pulse-
progression-levels-announced.
3
rd
Life Discovery – Doing Science Education
Conference has a October 2 deadline for Hands-
on Workshop and Short Presentation proposals.
The theme is “Creating Connections – Biology in
Action,” which focuses on stimulating approaches
to Life Science instruction that:
• Connect learning to life science careers in re-
search and practice: What is it like to be a
Biologist?
• Connect learning to current events: What is
the relevance of Biology?
• Connect learning across institutions and set-
tings: How do we build bridges across edu-
cation settings?
Hope to see some of you in Baltimore this spring!
60 years ago:
“A new journal, Virology, is being published by Academic Press Inc., 125 East
23rd St., New York 10, N. Y. Editors are George K. Hirst (Public Health Res. Institute of New York),
Lindsay M. Black (Univ. of Illinois), and S. E. Luria (Univ. of Illinois). Subscription price is $9.00
per year. “ PSB 1(3)
50 years ago:
Irving W. Knobloch of Michigan State University reported on the Fifth Summer
Institute for College Teachers of Botany, held in the summer of 1965. “One hundred and forty-
six applied, and 27 were accepted plus two sent to us by the NSF on their foreign-participant
program. These participants came from 17 states of the Union and from three foreign countries.
Twenty of the 29 had Ph.D. degrees, and the remaining nine had masters’ degrees. The intelligence
of the group varied about an unknown, and hence undisclosable, mean, but none of them could
be considered subaverage. All were fine, earnest people, anxious for knowledge about the latest
advances in the various aspects of botany.” PSB 11(3)
From the
PSB Archives
105
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
106
STUDENT SECTION
By Jon Giddens, Angela McDonnell,
and Becky Povilus Student Representatives
A Word from the Student
Representatives
The BSA Executive Board
Welcomes Becky Povilus as
the New Student
Representative
The Executive Board of the Botanical Society
of America includes two student representatives
who are elected by the student membership. Each
of the two student representatives serve a two-
year term, with a new representative elected each
year. The student representative position was first
created in 2006 as a way to engage student members
of the BSA in the governance of the society. Since
2006, student membership of the society has been
represented by nine student members.
This year, we say thank you to Jon Giddens,
who rotates off the executive board, and welcome
our 10th elected representative, Ms. Becky Povilus
of Harvard University. We sat down to talk about
her research how she came to be on the executive
board.
When did you join BSA and what motivated
you to do so?
I joined my first year of grad school, when I started
working on my Ph.D. I remember that my advisor
(Dr. Ned Friedman) was specifically promoting his
own aspiration of a “perfect attendance” record at
the annual BSA conference.
What motivated you to run for the position of
Student Representative to the Board of Directors?
I hadn’t really thought about running for the
position until I started working as part of the
team that helps run microMORPH, a research
coordination network that organizes workshops,
summer courses, and travel grants to promote
research in plant evolution and development. As
I got a handle on that, a mentor suggested that I
think about being a BSA student rep. Learning how
to make an organization work or how to organize a
conference/meeting/workshop takes a lot of time,
but I think it’s a very useful skill set both in and
outside of academia.
What is your favorite thing about BSA so far?
BSA does a really good job of encouraging
student participation, especially at conferences.
There are a lot of awards you can apply for, to help
with travel costs, and everyone is very supportive.
What is your research about?
Broadly, the evolution of seed development in
flowering plants. I like thinking about how the
developmental processes that take a fertilized ovule
and turn it into a functional seed have evolved as a
defining part of angiosperm reproduction. As such,
my research centers on how endosperm develops
and what it is actually doing in a seed. One thing
in particular that I am interested in is imprinting
and parent-of-origin effects on endosperm
development—this is something that has been
investigated at the molecular level in only a couple
of model angiosperm systems. As part of my
dissertation, I’m looking into how imprinting has
evolved as an important regulator of endosperm
Becky Povilus, new BSA Student Representative.
107
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
and seed development in flowering plants.
I’m doing much of this research with the
waterlily Nymphaea thermarum, which is a really
special species. It is a member of one of the earliest
diverging angiosperm lineages, is annual, is small,
and is relatively easy to grow in a greenhouse (all
rare traits among early diverging angiosperms).
There are a bunch of other features that make
it a good system to work with, but it also has an
interesting history: shortly after being described in
the late 1980s, it was declared to be extinct in the
wild (populations were maintained thanks to people
working at Botanischen Gärten der Universität
Bonn and Kew). Altogether, it’s a great example
of why exploring and preserving biodiversity is
essential for basic scientific research.
What sorts of experiences have you had that
helped to guide you to the path of your current
research interests?
Other projects not working out have certainly
been a big factor. Probably one of the most
important moments, however, was Googling
“annual miniature waterlily” while looking for an
amenable experimental system to work on and
learning about Nymphaea thermarum. I’m really
grateful for the work that people at Kew and
Bonn have done to figure out how to grow the N.
thermarum, and that they made all that information
readily available.
What has been the most challenging part of
your research?
Learning when enough is enough, and figuring
out how to design a project so that you can have
other people to work on it, too.
What has been the most rewarding part of
your research?
For day-to-day thrills, nothing is better than
getting a sample to look gorgeous under a
microscope. And this is going to sound really corny,
but no matter how many slides I look at, looking at
a new slide for the first time is still like opening a
present: you don’t know what’s there and it might be
something really exciting (or it could be that your
tissue got destroyed during processing and looks
terrible, but that just makes the good samples all
the more special, right?).
Is there anything you know now about being a
graduate student that you wish you would have
known as an undergraduate student?
Learn some programming languages! I’m
starting to get a handle on some basics for statistical
analysis and bioinformatics, but I’m pretty sure that
a lot of the more I could do to streamline my data
collection/processing.
What sorts of hobbies do you have?
I’m not sure if this counts as a hobby, but I spend
quite a bit of time trying to figure out how to fit
one more plant on my windowsills at home and by
my desk. I am also lucky to be based at the Arnold
Arboretum in Boston; not only is the lab building
on arboretum grounds, but my commute takes me
through the collections every day. It’s hard to not
get distracted by all of the plants and what they are
doing throughout the year—I definitely get into lab
later when I have a camera with me.
Connect with the BSA
If you are interested in nominating a student to
become the next student representative, or if you’re
a student interested in serving on the board, be
sure to look out for the call for nominations in your
email from BSA each spring. It’s a great opportunity
to learn about the Society and to gain a variety
of experiences. Duties for the position typically
include organizing a couple of events at the annual
meeting, writing four newsletters to students,
writing several articles for the Plant Science Bulletin,
and attending two yearly board meetings, one of
which happens at the annual meeting. If you have
any questions about the position, feel free to contact
the student representatives (Angela McDonnell at
angela.mcdonnell@okstate.edu or Becky Povilus at
rpovilus@fas.harvard.edu) any time. We’re always
open to hearing your ideas or answering questions!
Alternatively, you can connect with us on our
Facebook group page by searching for Students of
the Botanical Society of America.
108
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
Students Succeed at
Botany 2015
We would like to extend a huge “thanks!” to
everyone who attended the annual Botany 2015
meeting in Edmonton, Alberta. It was an excellent
meeting filled with workshops that enabled
attendees to learn about new techniques, including
botanical illustration, next generation sequencing
techniques, and niche modeling methods. There
were also numerous opportunities for networking
with our peers at the coffee breaks, banquets, and
mixers. Above all, there were many great talks
regarding current research, over given by students!
A list of award-winning talks and posters can
be found in this issue of Plant Science Bulletin.
Students comprised about a third of
attendees
and many attended our annual luncheon Monday
afternoon and the social and networking event
Monday night. Stay tuned for links on the www.
botany.org website for a link to the presentation
given by Dr. Kate Hertweck (University of Texas
at Tyler) at the luncheon! We look forward to the
next Botany meeting in Savannah, Georgia, July
30-August 3, 2016.
109
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Harvard University
Offering Bullard Fellowships
in Forest Research
Annually, Harvard University awards a limited
number of Bullard Fellowships to individuals in
biological, social, physical, and political sciences
and the arts to promote advanced study or the
integration of subjects pertaining to forested
ecosystems. The program seeks to allow mid-
career individuals to develop their own scientific
and professional growth by using the resources
and interacting with personnel in any department
within Harvard University. In recent years
Bullard Fellows have been associated with the
Harvard Forest, Department of Organismic
and Evolutionary Biology, and the J. F. Kennedy
School of Government, and they have worked
in areas of ecology, forest management, policy,
and conservation. Stipends of up to $60,000 are
available for periods ranging from six months to
one year and are not intended for travel, graduate
students, or recent post-doctoral candidates.
Applications from international scientists, women,
and minorities are encouraged.
Additional information is available on the
Harvard Forest web site (http://harvardforest.fas.
harvard.edu). Annual deadline for applications is
February 1.
110
Book Reviews
Economic Botany
Midwest Maize: How Corn Shaped the U.S. Heartland. ................................................110
Evolution
How the Earth Turned Green: A 3.8-Billion-Year History of Plants ..............................111
History
Fathers of Botany: The Discovery of Chinese Plants by European Missionaries ..........112
Systematics
A Californian’s Guide to the Trees Among Us ...............................................................113
Economic Botany
Midwest Maize: How Corn Shaped
the U.S. Heartland
Cynthia Clampitt
2015. ISBN-13: 978-0-252-08057-9
Paperback, US$19.95. 296 pp.
University of Illinois Press, Champaign,
Illinois, USA.
As one who has studied the evolution of maize
for most of his career, I thoroughly enjoyed this
ethno/economical history of the impact of maize
cultivation on the “corn belt.” Where others have
focused on maize in its heartland (Staller et al.,
2006) or maize as a food crop (Fussell, 1992),
Clampitt presents an environmental history of
corn’s role in the development of the Midwest. The
text is well documented with copious endnotes to
support additional reading. It is also filled with
interesting factoids that will be useful when I next
teach economic botany—or introductory botany
for that matter.
The first two chapters cover European discovery
and the diversification of corn. For instance, it is
well documented that maize was part of the original
Columbian exchange. I did not know Magellan
carried seeds with him on his circumnavigation
and introduced maize to the Philippines. I also did
not know that the Venetians shipped corn across
the Mediterranean to the Middle East from whence
it was re-traded to northern Europe as “Turkish
wheat.” Both of these events led to early confusion
about the center of origin of maize being in Asia.
So where is the “midwest” of the title? This is
explained in the next two chapters on settling the
Midwest. I was surprised to find that the term
“middle west” was first applied to Kansas and
Nebraska shortly after the American Civil War and
would only spread to “the great interior region,
bounded east by the Alleghenies, north by the
British dominions, west by the Rocky Mountains,
and south by the line along wshich the culture of
corn and cotton meets” (Lincoln, 1862). (As a
native Minnesotan, I always thought of Kansas
as being “the west”!) Midwest is frequently used
as a synonym for the somewhat older term “corn
belt.” According to Clampitt, Chicago became the
capital of this region by the mid-1850s in large part
because of the huge grain elevators built there and
the establishment of the Chicago Board of Trade.
Corn was now a commodity that helped to feed the
northern armies. The Chicago Union Stockyard,
home of hogs and corn-fed beef, was established in
1865 as the war ended. The rail center of the country
had grain elevators and animal pens dotting its rail
lines in all directions.
The development of farming and milling technology
is the focus of the next two chapters. Most of
the early technological changes involving farm
machinery used in other crops were applied equally
well to maize. A major difference was harvesting.
Even in the 1940s much corn was still being picked
by hand. It wasn’t until 1954 that a reliable “corn
head” could be attached to a combine that could
pick, husk, and shell corn automatically. Food
processing consisted only of what home gardeners
do today, although done on a much larger scale.
With the exception of a short chapter on popcorn,
the next four chapters read like the background
to the indie documentary King Corn. In today’s
food world, corn is invisible and ubiquitous. It is
111
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
transformed into chicken, pork, beef, and corn
spirits. The invention of wet milling allowed
production of corn starch, and from there it was
simple chemistry to producing fructose and high
fructose corn sweeteners. What more could we ask
for? Let’s read about methanol or GM corn.
The last five chapters deal with the human culture
of corn in the Midwest. It begins with various
celebrations of corn, from corn palaces (yes, there
were more than just Mitchell, South Dakota) and
corn festivals to county, state, and world’s fairs (in
Chicago, 1893; Omaha, 1898; and St. Louis, 1904).
It includes a history of ethnic immigration and
its influence on corn cuisine (with a chapter of
recipes). The final chapter addresses questions and
issues related to the future of corn in the United
States. My only question is why Olivia, Minnesota?
Why does this small town of a few thousand
people, proclaimed “Corn Capital of the World,”
have “nine seed-research companies, two leading
contract seed-production companies, the world’s
largest seed-corn broker, and an agricultural
environmental solutions company…”?
–Marshall D. Sundberg, Professor of Botany, Emporia
State University, Emporia, Kansas, USA.
Literature Cited
Fussell, B. 1992. The Story of Corn. University of New
Mexico Press, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Lincoln, A. 1862. Address to the Senate and House of
Representatives. Website http://www.perseus.tufts.
edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2006.05.0642:a
rticle=4&highlightauth=tgn%2C7007520#match1
[accessed 5 June 2015].
Staller, J. E., R. H. Tykot, and B. F. Benz. 2006. Histories
of Maize in Mesoamerica. Left Coast Press, Walnut
Creek, California, USA.
Evolution
How the Earth Turned Green: A
Brief 3.8-Billion-Year History of
Plants
Joseph E. Armstrong
2015. ISBN-13: 978-0-226-06977-7
Paperback, US$45.00. 576 pp.
University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois,
USA
Joseph Armstrong’s new book, How the Earth
Turned Green: A Brief 3.8-Billion-Year History of
Plants, is a remarkable volume on the evolutionary
history of green life on our planet. It is a thoroughly
enjoyable and readable book on what might have
been a dry and tedious subject: plant evolution and
diversity. I highly recommend this book as a text for
a class on green plant evolution or plant diversity,
as a reference book on green plant structure
and evolution, or as general reading for anyone
interested in the topic.
The book, structurally, is laid out in a way typical
for a textbook, but that is where the correlation with
“typical” ends. It begins with a humorously written
preface, and is followed by 11 chapters, a brief
postscript, a lengthy appendix, notes, a glossary,
references, and an index. All standard stuff, it
seems. However, the book is far from standard, and,
for a textbook, the content is presented in a unique
manner that makes it stand out from the crowd.
Material in the text is unapologetically evolutionary
in outlook and organization, as should be the case,
since evolution is the foundation on which all
modern biological science rests. Chapter subtitles
and introductory quotations help make each
chapter accessible and engaging. The language used
throughout is non-technical (insofar as is possible
when discussing scientific concepts) and readable,
but for the educated (high school biology or college
biology), not for those without an understanding
of the basics of biological science. In style, the
writing is engaging and filled with humor, and
the reader is drawn on from one chapter to the
next by the building of story upon story, and layer
upon layer, of the history of green organisms. Well-
executed drawings, as well as photographs, charts,
and graphs, all serve to clarify terminology and
concepts as they are introduced in the text, which
adds to the accessibility of the information being
presented.
112
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
Beginning with the basics (how science
works, evolutionary principles, plate tectonics,
biogeography, ecology, taxonomy/nomenclature,
origins, cosmology, etc.), the discussion progresses
through organizational levels and phylogenetic
strata to end at the present-day diversity of green
organisms on our planet and how we interact with
plants. Along the way, Armstrong discusses the
structure of green organisms and their evolutionary
relationships, physiology, reproduction, and
biogeography. Coverage of technical details in the
chapters themselves, while not as deep as might
be found in older plant morphology texts such as
those of Bold (1973) or Foster and Gifford (1974), is
certainly deep enough that the reader comes away
with a fundamental understanding of the natures of
the groups under discussion, and it is all presented
in a manner that is not plodding and pedantic, but
more fluid and holistic. Some of the details are saved
until the end, in a very comprehensive appendix.
The chapters in the book build on one another,
beginning with bacteria and archaea, progressing
through endosymbiosis and early eukaryotes to
“algae” and life in oceans. Then follow chapters
on the invasion of land, including structural and
reproductive changes necessary for that to occur;
pioneer organisms; and the rise of flowering plants.
Along the way, the reader learns about many topics,
including (to name a few) such basic things as what
defines a plant, symbiosis, photosynthesis and the
origin of chlorophyll, stromatolites, unicellularity
and multicellularity, bryophytes, vascularity,
the origin of seeds, and that ever-popular topic,
sex. To me, the appendix at the end of the book,
which covers lineages of green organisms (except
angiosperms!), is the meat on the bones of the
11 chapters that precede it, and gives the book its
status as a textbook. Here are presented the details
that will give a budding botanist a foundation for
growth in the science.
One of the things that makes this book a success
is the joy with which Armstrong discusses plants.
His stated goals for the book include combating
“plant-blindness,” and he accomplishes this with
great success. He strives to get the reader beyond an
“angiosperm-centric” view of plants by helping the
reader obtain “a more sophisticated perspective”
of what the green organisms of our planet are all
about. The book is full of things we, as botanists,
may think of as common knowledge. These things
should be more widely known among the general
populace so that our planet and the organisms that
inhabit it can continue; this text works to make that
happen.
–Michael A. Vincent, Department of Biology,
Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA. vincenma@
miamioh.edu
Literature Cited
Bold, H. C. 1973. Morphology of Plants, 3rd ed. Harper
and Row, New York, New York, USA.
Foster, A. S., and E. M. Gifford Jr. 1974. Comparative
Morphology of Vascular Plants, 2nd ed. W. H.
Freeman and Co., San Francisco, California, USA.
History
Fathers of Botany: The Discovery
of Chinese Plants by European
Missionaries
Jane Kilpatrick
2015. ISBN: 978-0-226-20670-7
Cloth, US$60.00. 224 pp.
University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois,
USA
The evergreen subject of botany or the study
of plants has fascinated human minds and
imaginations through the ages. The knowledge of
plants and their intricate relationship with humans
has been studied by several pioneering and brilliant
minds during different phases of the history of
botanical research, expeditions, and explorations.
The contributions of both professional and amateur
botanists in remote corners of the globe must
be remembered by modern-day plant scientists,
academics, and researchers with due respect for the
unimaginable hardships and obstacles that these
pioneers endured during their working life. Their
dedication in collecting plant samples; drawing
high-quality images of exotic specimens; preparing
biogeographical maps revealing the distribution of
plant species from specific regions; documenting
the detailed descriptions and potential economic
importance of plant species; and preparing classical
descriptive studies on plant morphology and
anatomy, taxonomic treatments, and identification
keys has provided the basic foundation of the
subject of botany to which modern plant science
research is heavily indebted.
Some of the first botanists to enrich the subject
and to introduce several of the currently globally
celebrated ornamental and horticultural species
113
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
of plants from China were the French Christian
missionaries. These French missionaries were
the first serious plant explorers to travel, explore,
collect, and document plants from China and
to introduce these species to European gardens
through their painstaking collection of seeds
during the second half of the 19th century. The
author has highlighted this period in botanical
history through the contributions of four famous
French missionaries and pioneering botanists who
are recognized as “fathers of botany”—namely,
Pères Armand David, Jean Marie Delavay, Paul
Guillaume Farges, and Jean André Soulié. She has
also documented the contributions of several other
French and European priests and missionaries, as
well as the German Protestant pastor Ernst Faber,
for their seminal work in collecting specimens and
data on Chinese plants and introducing these plants
to the West and to Western botanical scholars.
Their contributions have changed the dynamics
of botany and enriched the lives of countless plant
lovers, botanists, horticulturists, and researchers
across the globe. The author has meticulously
organized the volume with documentation (possibly
the first of its kind) on the lives and contributions
of these nearly forgotten early pioneers. In doing
so, she vividly describes that age in relation to the
sociocultural history of China and presents the
opportunities and challenges that emerged with
it. She has drawn a fairly accurate picture of the
constant hardships, struggles, and obstacles these
pioneers endured in exploring the plant resources
of China following the post-1842 Opium War treaty
that opened China to the European missionaries.
The efforts of these men to successfully introduce
several species of the Chinese flora to Europe are
described in lucid language that allows readers to
visualize the history as it unfolds.
The volume includes more than 250 color
plates, covering spectacular images of plants;
biogeographical maps; original illustrations
and maps prepared by early pioneers; original
herbarium specimens of the period; mind-blowing
photos of the different ecological habitats and
biomes within China explored by the pioneers;
and archival images of several pioneer botanist-
missionaries, priests, pastors, clergymen, and the
botanical regions they visited and explored. The
volume not only captures the exploits of the pioneer
botanist-missionaries in China, but also nicely
portrays the sociocultural flavor of China during
that period.
The current volume is divided into 17 chapters,
along with a nice introduction, exploring the life
and work of these missionaries in China; events
are presented chronologically. Also included are
a list of short biographies of the botanists and
explorers covered in the volume; a gazetteer that
provides the current and old names of different
geographic locations of China discussed in the
volume; and three handy appendices—Sources and
General Bibliography, Notes and References, and
a comprehensive index to aid serious researchers
who wish to dig further.
The current volume presents an age that has
been nearly forgotten. The author explores this
history through published articles and reports,
personal letters, rare and old travel journals,
botanical magazines, and government and/or
official documents. The volume will be a useful
reference for both undergraduate- and graduate-
level students in botany, plant sciences, forestry,
horticulture, and economic botany.
–Saikat Kumar Basu, University of Lethbridge,
Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
Systematics
A Californian’s Guide to the Trees
Among Us
Matt Ritter
2011. ISBN-13: 978-1-59714-147-5
Paperback, US$18.95. 192 pp.
Heyday Books, Berkeley, California, USA
The urban landscape is an underutilized classroom
for botany. As a recent transplant to California, I am
often stymied when students ask about common
street trees in the area. Despite well-curated floras
and field guides for native and naturalized plant life,
similar resources for street trees are often lacking—
particularly guides that are not restricted to a single
city and that balance scientific rigor with ease and
enjoyment of use.
A Californian’s Guide to the Trees Among Us expertly
fills this need. Detailed yet accessible entries feature
150 of the most commonly planted species in the
state. This book is a cornucopia of information
that is accessible to the novice enthusiast or most
devoted urbanite yet will also be interesting to the
professional botanist.
114
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
Each page usually represents a single species or a
collection of related species that are commonly
planted street trees in California. A header
introduces the scientific name (with its etymology,
pronunciation, and most recognized synonyms),
botanical family, most typically used common
name, native range, and mating system. Following
the header is a paragraph that notes distinguishing
features along with other interesting information
such as ecology, phenology, economic and other
human uses, and distribution within California.
Finally, beautiful color photos at several scales
visually reinforce the written description,
distinguishing features of each tree such as habit,
bark, fruit, flowers, cone, and leaves.
These descriptions form the core of the book but
by no means are its only merit. I was particularly
impressed with the dichotomous key at the
beginning of the book. Clear and concise, it relies
greatly on vegetative characters although fruits
or flowers may be necessary for a complete ID.
Moreover, the keys are forgiving of human error. For
example, you can still correctly identify Casuarina
even if you misinterpret the slender green branchlets
as leaves or determine that leaves are absent all
together. The key also includes several dozen less-
common species that do not have complete entries
but may be encountered nonetheless. I tested this
key using 10 randomly selected street trees from
around the San Francisco Bay area. Eight of the
plants I keyed successfully, one was not included in
the book (Solanum rantonnetii), and one was not
in the proper phenological stage for identification.
Sprinkled throughout this book are other gems:
Tree-related quotes are offered like small but
inspirational after-dinner mints. Several top 10 lists
rate which trees are California’s showiest, largest,
most common along roadways, show the best fall
color, or (importantly) most likely to trip you on
the sidewalk. Through science, humor, and the arts,
the author’s goal of fostering a holistic appreciation
and reverence for trees shines through.
Like any work, this book is not without flaws.
For example, treating palms in a separate section
from the angiosperms may be convenient for
perusing photos, but it unnecessarily obscures the
evolutionary relationships. Aside from a list buried
on page 9, discussion of native trees appropriate
for an urban or suburban environment is absent.
Such a discussion, perhaps as an appendix, would
have been an excellent opportunity to connect
the urban, natural, and historical treescapes of
California. However, such criticisms are minor and
do not detract from this overall informative and
enjoyable field guide. Photographer George Cedric
Wright wrote, “What man may acquire from trees
is immeasurable.” This book is the scythe with
which one may begin to reap such a harvest—a tool
I wholeheartedly recommend to anyone in or near
California who is interested in better understanding
and appreciating the literal “urban jungle.”
–Adam C. Schneider, Jepson Herbarium and
Department of Integrative Biology, University of
California, Berkeley, California, USA. acschneider@
berkeley.edu
The Plants of Sudan and South
Sudan: An Annotated Checklist
Iain Darbyshire, Maha Kordofani, Imadeldin
Farag, Ruba Candiga, and Helen Pickering
(editors)
2015. ISBN-13: 978-1-84246-473-1
Paperback, US$125.00. 400 pp.
Kew Publishing, Royal Botanic Gardens,
Kew, Richmond, Surrey, United Kingdom
Preliminary to a full flora of a region, a complete,
synonymized checklist provides a useful guide to
the species present. It can have varied applications
beyond establishing a baseline for professional
taxonomists. Gentry (1978: 148) points out that
“[a]n accurate checklist of plant species is
exceedingly useful to non-taxonomists wishing to
identify the plants of an area. Such species checklists
can greatly facilitate land use planning, for example,
in selection of critical areas to be preserved as forest
preserves and national parks.”
This collaboration between the Royal Botanic
Gardens, Kew, the University of Khartoum, and
the University of Juba updates F. W. Andrews’
Flowering Plants of the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan
initiated 65 years ago (vol. 1, 1950—vol. 3, 1956).
Former Sudan, the largest country in Africa before
the secession of South Sudan, contains a varied
ecology and biodiversity that ranges from extremely
arid and semiarid in the north to the Sudd wetlands
in South Sudan, providing habitats for myriad
species.
The Sudan checklist was developed through
literature searches, relying primarily on the
completed floras of adjacent regions: the Flora of
Ethiopia and Eritrea and the Flora of Tropical East
Africa, along with reference to select herbarium
115
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
specimens. The most extensive historical herbarium
collections from Sudan are held at Kew and the
Natural History Museum, London; some recent
herbarium collections are housed at the University
of Khartoum.
The contents are organized as follows: (1) a 7-page
introduction to Sudan’s geography, climate, and
regional vegetation; (2) a 14-page historical review
about the early exploration of Sudan, portraying
the principal plant collectors in the region; (3)
explanatory notes; (4) a bibliography (6 pp.) and
index (12 pp.); (5) a preliminary list of potentially
threatened plant species, along with an assessment
of the status of exploration in each region; and (6)
the inventory, by far the central contribution of the
book. Each species is listed with selected synonyms,
habitat, and collection-based geographic range.
The arrangement is alphabetical by the botanical
rank of order, monocotyledons first, followed by
dicotyledons. However, within each order, the
sequence of families does not always appear to
follow either the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group
(Stevens, 2001 onwards) or alphabetical order;
it is unclear to this reviewer what plan is being
used. Arrangement of families by taxonomic
order may seem sensible for an audience of users
who are strictly taxonomists or evolutionary
botanists who understand those contiguous
relationships; however, for an audience of
generalists, an alphabetical arrangement by family
name might make searching more effortless,
enabling the client unfamiliar with higher-order
taxonomic relationships to more readily locate
the group of interest without using the index. As
molecular phylogenetic analyses provide fresh
evidence, hypotheses regarding the relatedness of
taxonomic groups are ever more fluid and evolving.
Arrangement by family in alphabetical order might
be a more stable organizing principle, as was used
for the Bolivia checklist (Jørgensen et al., 2014).
Done properly, checklists—the results of protracted
field surveys and lengthy library research—can
provide important, current, baseline information
for the appraisal of potentially endangered,
restricted taxa. However, checklists may be biased
by the recorders’ selection of sources or a decision
to settle on one perceived expert, without searching
further. That is apparently what happened in some
treatments. For example, the editors’ own stated
procedures were not followed in the following case.
On p. 53, they assert that: “We have attempted to use
the most recent taxonomic works available” and “In
general, we have followed the accepted names and
synonymy in the African Plant Database.” However,
in the case of Pedaliaceae, neither practice was
adhered to. The source turned to for nomenclature
(Ihlenfeldt, 2006) uses the Latin binomial Sesamum
orientale L. for the crop plant sesame, although the
more widely used synonym S. indicum L. has been
conserved over the former name (McNeill et al.,
2006). Admittedly, that reference was written by an
acknowledged specialist, but it is unfortunate that
the editors failed to search the latest literature. More
editing and reviewing should have occurred by this
point in time, here as well as for the Bolivia checklist
(Jørgensen et al., 2014), as such errors can become
quite persistent in the literature. While an attempt
was made to consult family specialists in a few
cases, it would be beneficial to invite consultants to
check those details for each family.
Another conundrum for this reviewer as regards the
entry about sesame is to understand the meaning of
the phrase: “Native of India and Africa (not Sudan).”
“Native” species are widely understood to be those
that occur within political borders before outside
contact, prior to transfer as a result of human
influence. Because the object is a cultivated plant,
the focus ought to be its center of origin (i.e., place
of domestication). Therefore, the wording, which
evokes a vast geographic region spanning two
continents, is baffling and unlikely. Alternatively,
one might simply point out that sesame has been
widely cultivated across the tropics for centuries.
Overall, this checklist may be useful for ecologists,
taxonomists, and researchers interested in
biodiversity evaluation, as well as for the layout
of conservation reserves and for projecting the
effects of climate change on species distributions.
An updated, accurate, and comprehensive checklist
was needed to provide a baseline for future
botanical and conservation work in the Sudan
region. Given that the world’s biological diversity
is increasingly endangered by human activities,
the need for a database that enables researchers to
conduct thorough surveys efficiently is obvious. I
am eagerly awaiting the publication of the full flora
as a follow up, and would be delighted to contribute
to that work. Optimistically, its preparation should
also spur further botanical studies in the Sudan
region.
–Dorothea Bedigian, Missouri Botanical Garden, St.
Louis, Missouri, USA
116
Plant Science Bulletin 61 (3) 2015
Literature Cited
Gentry, A. H. 1978. Floristic knowledge and needs in
Pacific Tropical America. Brittonia 30(2): 134–153.
Ihlenfeldt, H. D. 2006. Pedaliaceae. In I. Hedberg and
S. Edwards (eds.), Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea,
vol. 5, 335–344. National Herbarium, Addis Ababa
University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Uppsala
University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jørgensen, P. M., M. H. Nee, and S. G. Beck (editors).
2014. Catálogo de las Plantas Vasculares de Bolivia.
Monographs in Systematic Botany 127. Missouri
Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
McNeill, J., F. R. Barrie, H. M. Burdet, V. Demoulin, D.
L. Hawksworth, K. Marhold, D. H. Nicolson, et al.
(editors). 2006. International Code of Botanical
Nomenclature (Vienna Code). Regnum Veg. 146: 462.
Stevens, P. F. 2001 onwards. Angiosperm Phylogeny
Website. Version 12, July 2012 [and more or less
continuously updated since]. http://www.mobot.org/
MOBOT/research/APweb/.
Plant Science Bulletin
Featured Image
The Botanical Society of
America is a membership
society whose mission is to:
promote botany, the field of
basic science dealing with the
study & inquiry into the form,
function, development, diversity,
reproduction, evolution, & uses
of plants & their interactions
within the biosphere.
ISSN 0032-0919
Published quarterly by
Botanical Society of America, Inc.
4475 Castleman Avenue
St. Louis, MO 63166-0299
Periodicals postage is paid at
St. Louis, MO & additional
mailing offices.
POSTMASTER:
Send address changes to:
Botanical Society of America
Business Office
P.O. Box 299
St. Louis, MO 63166-0299
bsa-manager@botany.org
The yearly subscription rate
of $15 is included
in the membership
Address Editorial Matters (only)
to:
Mackenzie Taylor, Editor
Department of Biology
Creighton University
2500 California Plaza
Omaha, NE 68178
Phone 402-280-2157
psb@botany.org
Plant Science
Bulletin
Fall 2015 Volume 61 Number 3
The PLANTS Grant program, by the numbers
• Out of the 2011 and 2012 cohorts of PLANTS recipients,
82% are in doctoral programs or completed Masters
programs.
• Nearly 29% of the 2011-2013 PLANTS recipients have
earned NSF GRFP or Ford Foundation fellowships.
•
During the period of the PLANTS grant, the diversity
of the BSA membership improved greatly from 2.3% to
9.1% self-identifying as Hispanic/Latino/Latina, Native
American, African Americans, Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
or Other.
• Between 2011 and 2015, 62 students received PLANTS
grants.
•
A new 5-year grant of $99,930 has just been awarded
by NSF - PLANTS II: Increasing the diversity of plant
scientists.
In your own words -
what botany means to you!
Be sure and view the video at:
botany.org
View on Issuu.com
